CANarchy’s right to sell beer to go turned on whether its leased breweries counted as owned premises under Texas law. The Fifth Circuit addressed that distinction in 2022.
TTB’s 2022 proposal would have changed what brewers report, which records they keep, and how they document premises and operations. Here are ten proposals from Notice No. 212.
The first installment on Public Act 102-0442 covers changes affecting mead, taprooms, Class 3 brewers, self-distribution, and alternating premises.
The CANarchy dispute turned on which brewery premises Texas counts when applying its beer-to-go production limit. Read the district court analysis from 2021.
A 2020 overview considers restructuring options for breweries, wineries, distilleries, bars, and restaurants facing severe pandemic-related disruption.
Early 2020 SBA disaster loan resources for bars, restaurants, breweries, wineries, distilleries, and alcohol distributors.
An Illinois county settled a religious land use dispute over a Catholic organization’s plans for a brewery and winery.
A 2019 photography complaint against 8 Degrees Plato offers a reminder to secure rights for images used on beverage websites and marketing materials.
A failed brewery’s bankruptcy dispute examines investor claims against its founder and offers lessons about promises, records, and financial disclosure.
Idaho’s 2019 contract-brewing provisions define participating brewers and offer a statutory model for clarifying production arrangements elsewhere.
The 2013 Magic Hat–West Sixth dispute illustrates how trademark litigation, public statements, and social-media campaigns can intersect.
