Kona Brewing loses request for appeal of class certification for plaintiffs alleging harm from Hawaii-centric labels. One judge recognized what this means for Kona in the dispute.

You’ll recall back in October we reported that the district court had certified the class in the action brought by consumers claiming they were mislead by Kona’s labels into purchasing the craft brewer’s beer because they believed it was made in Hawaii.

Similar to other statements or implications of origin labelling suits, a alcoholic beverage producer is sued for alleged inferences or direct statements of origin made on its labels. Plaintiffs allege that they would not have bought the beverage, and would have purchased a cheaper beverage, but for the labeling implications.

Kona thought the decision to certify the class against them was improper and they sought leave to appeal that decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals back in November shortly after the class was certified.

On Friday, the Court of Appeals denied Kona’s request for an appeal of the determination. While these orders are typically issued without much written support or comment, it is important here that at least one judge, Judge Gould, recognized what a denial of the appeal would mean for Kona and added a dissent expressing that fact which eloquently summarizes the pressures faced by Kona on account of the denial:

Judge Gould respectfully dissents and would grant the petition for the reasons that (1) certification may cause the defendant unduly to feel pressed to reach a settlement without regard to merits because of the size of the California market for beer; (2) certification could resolve important unsettled legal questions presented in the petition where the Supreme Court’s position may be uncertain, and thus certification could contribute to the development of the law; and (3) as for whether there is manifest error, that is less clear because of my view that the law is somewhat unsettled, but the importance of the issues to me favor review.

You can read a copy of the order from the 9th Circuit here (link).

Ashley Brandt

Hi there! I’m happy you’re here. My name is Ashley Brandt and I’m an attorney in Chicago representing clients in the Food and Beverage, Advertising, Media, and Real Estate industries. A while back I kept getting calls and questions from industry professionals and attorneys looking for advice and information on a fun and unique area of law that I’m lucky enough to practice in. These calls represented a serious lack of, and need for, some answers, news, and information on the legal aspects of marketing and media. I've got this deep seeded belief that information should be readily available and that the greatest benefit from the information age is open access to knowledge... so ... this blog seemed like the best way to accomplish that. I enjoy being an attorney and it’s given me some amazing opportunities, wonderful experiences, and an appreciation and love for this work. I live in Chicago and work at an exceptional law firm, Goldstein & McClintock, with some truly brilliant people. Feel free to contact me at any time with any issues, comments, concerns… frankly, after reading this far, I hope you take the time to at least let me know what you think about the blog and how I can make it a better resource.

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. April 29, 2019

    […] reported on the lawsuit several times – in short, it alleged Kona brand misled customers into thinking they were buying beer made in Hawaii when the beer… in multiple locations across the U.S. Most recently, the Court presiding over the case had […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: