Site icon Libation Law Blog

Whacky details published in Kona Brewing “not made in Hawaii” false advertising lawsuit – $2.9 Million in attorneys’ fees, publication in National Geographic. Bonus: we’ve got the motion for you.

It will come as no surprise that no real action has to be taken by Craft Brew Alliance’s Kona Brewing as there wasn’t really a deception here. Here’s the brief filed by class counsel in support of the settlement with all the details and exhibits.

At the end, the attorneys are asking for $2,900,000.00 in fees and have estimated that they thing between 78,000 and 546,000 people will file claims, which, if undocumented can net them up to $10.00. Here’s the proposed payout:

That 78k to 546k has no basis, they put forth some claimed “comparable” class actions for beers with greater sales that had roughly 100k claims filed and in one, tracked what percentage the claims were to the potential class (in this case the class is estimated at 7.8 million – again with no real substantiation) and use that ration to get to these proposed numbers. In looking at the other cases they cite – my best guess is that it’s less than 78,000 claims, so – assuming the best case scenario of $10 – at most – $780,000 gets paid out.

Kona will be required to put the names of the breweries where the beer is made – all the beer, not the specific brewery of the beer in the package – which they do on the side of their bottles now, see:

Which is why there’s no harm here. They pretty much already did this.

Here’s how that’s presented in the motion:

To the extent permitted by law and/or regulation, CBA shall include a conspicuous statement on all consumer-facing Kona Beer packaging on a panel other than the bottom of the package that lists each location where the Kona Beers are brewed or lists the location or locations at which a particular Kona Beer is brewed, for a minimum of four years after the Effective Date. Settlement Agreement, ¶ 78(a). An exemplar mock-up of the new packaging is attached Settlement Agreement as Exhibit 7. Id. In addition, for a minimum of four years after the Effective Date, CBA’s General Counsel or his or her designee shall conduct annual meetings with CBA’s marketing department to review and comply with the injunctive terms of this Settlement. Id. ¶ 78(b).

Here’s what that actually looks like:

Proposed new packaging design from motion to approve class action settlement.

Again, a statement they already made on the side of the cans and bottles.

So what else?

Protecting consumers is a noble cause, but this doesn’t seem like it’s accomplishing anything beneficial.

 

Exit mobile version